data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d6de/3d6deb9068bafaaa3f289c8417c34e5e0b35500a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/95e28/95e28e09770ce3a95972c54e90e17a8e211ce876" alt=""
So, we've obviously seen a few of these Marvel Super-Heroes issues, and they were all inventory burn-off, clearing out unused stories. Some of them were probably intended as fill-in issues, if the regular creative team blew deadline; this issue's Spider-Man/Nick Fury story, for example, may have been intended for Marvel Team-Up. Other stories are more difficult to guess where they may have been meant to go: the biweekly Marvel Comics Presents used to run a lot of eight-page stories; while others may have been meant for back-ups in an annual; but where was an eleven-page Black Knight story going to be published? (In England, maybe?)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba33f/ba33fc80e1e1d6c0fb1d8072b23769c77dd90ccb" alt=""
Accordingly, the Spidey/Nick Fury story is workmanlike at best. Bill Mumy's "Scout's Motto" has a nice three-page opening sequence as a western before becoming a Wonder Man story; and the Black Knight tale is carried by Alan Davis art. This isn't the worst issue of this series; I know there was a two-part X-Men that may have been an unused back-up and I don't think they were good.
No comments:
Post a Comment